Disabling run on low health

[BlindSniper]

Subject pretty much explains everything. Just think: In real life, would you be able to run when you're heavely damaged? No? But of course: it will be hardest thing.

So, the idea is: When players health is low (25 HP or less), the shift button will no longer make him run. That's all.

Pretty simple idea, adds abit of realism and balance.

[scarfacemperor]

Realism would be only headshots kill instantly and other injuries kill faster or slower, from minutes to hours, even an heartshot would take as least 1 minute to kill. Oh, and a shot in the spine would completely paralyse you.

Ace of Spade isn't Fallout, keep full mobility, whatever the health

[BlindSniper]

Realism would be only headshots kill instantly and other injuries kill faster or slower, from minutes to hours, even an heartshot would take as least 1 minute to kill. Oh, and a shot in the spine would completely paralyse you.

Ace of Spade isn't Fallout, keep full mobility, whatever the health

Did I say that "oh hai guys i wanna make fallout out of ace of spades", fancypants? No. It's just an idea, I don't want game to turn all about realism, neither unrealistic. It will make people more accurate, no "rushing in combat with grenades", but camping and building fast-hand structures for self-defence. Game was actually meant for that.

[MrHaaaaaaxFF]

Favors the SMG quite a bit. You can just spray'n'pray, boom, people can't run from you.
So my anwser is no.

[Howl]

I vote No. Getting back to the tent to refill your life is hard enough already. And if I have to walk all the way back, I might as well just save some time and kill myself.

Just finish me off when you shoot me.

[Danqazmlp]

I'm not a fan of the idea. It would hinder scoring a lot.

[Articsledder]

I wouldn't really mind this. It seems like everyone else in this thread seems to forget what it was like just 1 update ago. Walking isn't very slow.

[DoomSplitter]

To be fair, they're right about this giving smg'ers even more of an advantage.

[MrMeow]

Nah, If anything I think higher spread would be better.
If you want a scientific explanation I will say one thing, Adrenaline.
You'd be too scared to stop running and you wouldn't feel it, So you'd still be able to run.

[Paratrooper]

Not really. This would give an advantage to all weapons. Two shots to the chest with rifle would effectively disable you. A blast with the shotgun would ensure your target won't secape.

[quote="scarfacemperor]Realism would be only headshots kill instantly [/quote]
People regularly forget that we wear helmets.

[Doctor]

Going with a yes, even if it might get a tad annoying. He never said no running while being shot at, right? Correct me if I am wrong but he only said no running in low health, which makes sense to me.

Who would be able to run properly after receiving 3 body shots?

[Fluttershy]

if youre near death sprinting is the least of your concerns. Plus that damage range pretty much makes a smg head shot cripple you. Screw that.

Who would be able to run properly after receiving 3 body shots?

are you suggesting it forces us to use the never used sneak function?

[Paratrooper]

Probably. I'd be more worried about bleeding out than not being able to sprint :/

[Doctor]

if youre near death sprinting is the least of your concerns. Plus that damage range pretty much makes a smg head shot cripple you. Screw that.

Who would be able to run properly after receiving 3 body shots?

are you suggesting it forces us to use the never used sneak function?

No, where did I even say that? I said RUN as in sprint properly, not walk.

[Frostified]

Gentlemen, did we even need sprint in the first place? Abolish sprinting alltogether or add more parkour elements to the game imo.
I din't like this ONLY for the fact it favours SMG users, if smg users weren't so OP then this would be fine. Then again, I don't want this turning into fallout either.

P.S Don't delete my post this time Doc :P.