Adding another element of stealth to the game

[razourik]

What they could do to add an element of stealth is:

- When you shoot, your player icon will flash just for a moment. Since we can tell if a baddy is shooting bullets, this is just for aesthetic purposes.

- When you're sprinting, you will be visible on the mini map.

[MrHaaaaaaxFF]

This is stealh? *facespades*

[Venator]

This is stealh? *facespades*

User warned for this post: Breaking rule 3e.~Doc

[armandux1]

This is stealh? *facespades*

User warned for this post: Breaking rule 3e.~Doc

[Tek2]

This is stealh? *facespades*

User warned for this post: Breaking rule 3e.~Doc

[DoomSplitter]

I think what the OP means is that his idea would promote people to start being more stealthy, not that the idea itself is a form of stealth.

[armandux1]

I think what the OP means is that his idea would promote people to start being more stealthy, not that the idea itself is a form of stealth.

But the title says adding another element of stealth, as in this suggestion is the stealth hes adding, but i somewhat agree with you he probably meant that this would make people sue stealth more, but the stealth, with tracers against a good team, is already hard, so why make it harder ?

[DoomSplitter]

But the title says adding another element of stealth, as in this suggestion is the stealth hes adding

It was probably just a bad wording, not everyone here is an English major (or speaks English, for that matter).

with tracers against a good team, is already hard, so why make it harder ?

I should have clarified: I don't think his idea is necessary either. Tracers and footsteps can already be used to pinpoint a person's location.

[Leonzable]

Adding stealth by making it harder to stealth?

logic lapse there

[Doctor]

I've warned three people in this thread for not contributing to the discussion at all by simply posting a quote of the post above them.

"3e: Say something constructive/helpful or say nothing at all. One-word posts are not generally considered constructive."

[Venator]

I've warned three people in this thread for not contributing to the discussion at all by simply posting a quote of the post above them.

"3e: Say something constructive/helpful or say nothing at all. One-word posts are not generally considered constructive."

1.maybe im against that suggestion and saying that it has nothing to do with stealth
2.thats not a one-word post

user was banned for this post -mikuli

[Doctor]

2.thats not a one-word post

Yes indeed, it didn't have any words, I am not here to discuss your warning, I let everyone why I warned you to avoid more posts being made like that, if you have anything against the suggestions then constructive criticism is always welcome, otherwise keep it to yourself. I will delete any other posts which are not related to the topic.

[armandux1]

I've warned three people in this thread for not contributing to the discussion at all by simply posting a quote of the post above them.

"3e: Say something constructive/helpful or say nothing at all. One-word posts are not generally considered constructive."

We quoted MrHaaaaaaxFF, because we completely agreed with his opinion, instead of writing, this doesn't add stealth, that's not stealth etc. The rule doesn't say you can't quote the opinion of an another person as your opinion, so if what we quoted isn't "contructive/helpful" MrHaaaaaaxFF should be warned too, not saying that you should go and warn him.

Just my 2 cents on this matter. :/

[mikuli]

No. The discussion of the warning ends here. Further ATTEMPTS of doing that will get bans.

As for the actual warning, rule 3e is cited correctly. Simply quoting what someone else has said is in no way contributing to the thread - contribution means coming up with something worth the time to read. Both you three, and the person who you quoted failed to come up with that.


Thread back on topic now, please.

[AEM]

I think stealth just makes the game more unrealistic, which I like to keep it real.