Note: This forum is merely an archive. It is no longer possible to register or post. - StackOverflow
New Ace of Spades Forums: http://buildandshoot.com/

Votekick /n

Got a great new idea for the game?

Votekick /n

Postby Regret » Thu Mar 22, 2012 2:43 am

I was thinking of being able to type /n if someone is being votekick.
This can be useful if someone is being votekicked by a raging player or "Deuces".

If this has been suggested before my apologies.
User avatar
Regret
Member
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:53 am

Re: Votekick /n

Postby Joeyray » Thu Mar 22, 2012 2:46 am

This used to be part of the system but it go canned, I am for it but if there is a group of griefers etc working together then the kick can get shot down quickly or no one votes anyway.......
"The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood!"- Bismark
User avatar
Joeyray
Member
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: Scotland/Pub/Bayou

Re: Votekick /n

Postby Altoids » Thu Mar 22, 2012 6:21 am

Lol you play RotMG!
User avatar
Altoids
Komrade Member
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:22 am
Location: At my desk, on my computer.

Re: Votekick /n

Postby GreaseMonkey » Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:45 am

I think I recall yelling at Ben about this when I was still technically a noob. It was in 0.52 so I got to enjoy it for 1 day but the way it was implemented there was terrible - if enough people /n'd early, it would cancel, and if not enough people voted, it'd cancel anyway, so it didn't really get a fair go from my understanding.

If there's anyone undecided, their votes really shouldn't count as instant /n.

Allowing /n would be good for unvoting, if this suggestion doesn't go through.

Personally I think there should be a minimum threshold of /y votes, and the /y votes need to be >= the /n votes (or > if you'd prefer it to be that way). A good floor() >= threshold could be something like

min(playercount-1,max(3,playercount*0.22))

which basically means "absolute maximum of (player count - 1); otherwise absolute minimum of 3 players; otherwise 22% of the players".

Once there is a clear majority, the vote should do what it's meant to do. Otherwise, it should wait until the timeout happens before anything is decided.

This could be experimented with and tweaked in pyspades.



Anyway, if you vote for this you get an airstrike.
GreaseMonkey
Bastion Member
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:14 pm
Location: ←        


Return to Game



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron