I saw some of the suggestions.....

[jdrewlowery]

this game being similar to minecraft has already brought immature little kids anyway, not saying I have a problem with the similarities(because I don't) but, this community's average age is probably like 13. basically, ruling out a good or bad idea because it's from a game you don't like(and probably haven't played) shouldn't be a valid reason for it not to be added.

I agree with you, but the problem is that not every suggestion inspired in CoD is good for the game. Some features could be really good for this game(e.g dynamic crosshairs), some could be really bad(e.g killstreaks) but we can't just rule out every suggestion because of that. We also can't however accept the suggestions, thinking the opposite way.
For me it is not a matter of if I like the game or not. Hell, I do like some CoDs(namely WaW and CoD4).

The problem is that those suggestions could bring in even more immature kids to the game, just from a different type.


Notice that you can replace every single time the word "CoD" is mentioned by "Battlefield" or "Minecraft", it ends not making any difference.

i came to aos in .75 what was it like befor that ?

[ChaosTLW]

what do you mean with the first paragraph? I'm not saying that suggestions would be accepted because they're in another game, I'm saying that it doesn't really matter if it's another game, it matters if the idea is good or bad.

I don't think it would really bring more immature kids by adding dynamic crosshairs, that would just make the game harder and less idiots would play because they can't "jump shot" anymore.(it is a good idea) some features would probably bring more kids, like adding attack dogs, but that's a stupid idea regardless of which games it's in.

I agree with you.

this game being similar to minecraft has already brought immature little kids anyway, not saying I have a problem with the similarities(because I don't) but, this community's average age is probably like 13. basically, ruling out a good or bad idea because it's from a game you don't like(and probably haven't played) shouldn't be a valid reason for it not to be added.

I agree with you, but the problem is that not every suggestion inspired in CoD is good for the game. Some features could be really good for this game(e.g dynamic crosshairs), some could be really bad(e.g killstreaks) but we can't just rule out every suggestion because of that. We also can't however accept the suggestions, thinking the opposite way.
For me it is not a matter of if I like the game or not. Hell, I do like some CoDs(namely WaW and CoD4).

The problem is that those suggestions could bring in even more immature kids to the game, just from a different type.


Notice that you can replace every single time the word "CoD" is mentioned by "Battlefield" or "Minecraft", it ends not making any difference.

i came to aos in .75 what was it like befor that ?

wat...

[Stealthbomber]

The problem with those CoD features is that they are going to atract the immature kids that you usually see playing CoD. I don't see problem with one or other feature from CoD, but copying 10 different things from other games is just bad.
Also, half of the game is building. Sometimes that building near the CP at F6 is going to save your team. Believe me, I've already seen matches be won or lost because of a single building near a tent. However, just going to A1 and building dicks and a cozy house is taking a slot and being useless. Building a good fort near a base, at least in ToW or TC, can be really, really useful.
inb4 we can get features from any game, but too many just make the game lose originality and attract immature kids. Building is not always bad, so next time thank the builders if a fort save your life.

I'll let you know when I find someone who actually builds something usefull kk

this game being similar to minecraft has already brought immature little kids anyway, not saying I have a problem with the similarities(because I don't) but, this community's average age is probably like 13. basically, ruling out a good or bad idea because it's from a game you don't like(and probably haven't played) shouldn't be a valid reason for it not to be added.

+10000

I'm not saying that suggestions would be accepted because they're in another game, I'm saying that it doesn't really matter if it's another game, it matters if the idea is good or bad.

That's my whole point and also I'd like to point out that not only CoD has these features but also BF3 and HALO they're just less mentioned due to their popularity.

[demo123]

Why is everyone comparing this game to the crappy CoD?
Why not compare it to a million times better Medal of Honor?

[jdrewlowery]

Why is everyone comparing this game to the crappy CoD?
Why not compare it to a million times better Medal of Honor?

wats medal of honor ?

[ChaosTLW]

Why is everyone comparing this game to the crappy CoD?
Why not compare it to a million times better Medal of Honor?

Which Medal of Honour? The newer wannabe-BF poopy one, or the older WWII ones?

The problem with those CoD features is that they are going to atract the immature kids that you usually see playing CoD. I don't see problem with one or other feature from CoD, but copying 10 different things from other games is just bad.
Also, half of the game is building. Sometimes that building near the CP at F6 is going to save your team. Believe me, I've already seen matches be won or lost because of a single building near a tent. However, just going to A1 and building dicks and a cozy house is taking a slot and being useless. Building a good fort near a base, at least in ToW or TC, can be really, really useful.
inb4 we can get features from any game, but too many just make the game lose originality and attract immature kids. Building is not always bad, so next time thank the builders if a fort save your life.

I'll let you know when I find someone who actually builds something usefull kk

Well, if you play as one of those retarded lone wolfers that only care for kills, of course you are not going to find any building useful.
Besides, play on ToW or TC instead of CTI, it turned into a TDM but with no limit on kills before end of round.

[demo123]

Why is everyone comparing this game to the crappy CoD?
Why not compare it to a million times better Medal of Honor?

Which Medal of Honour? The newer wannabe-BF poopy one, or the older WWII ones?

Older WWII ones.

[USABxGUNSLINGER]

Which Medal of Honour? The newer wannabe-BF poopy one, or the older WWII ones?.

The newer one isn't wannabe-poopy.

Anyway, AoS taking elements from the WW2 MoH's would be awesome (Medal of Honor is my favorite series, I've been playing it since I was about 2 or 3).

[Benton]

CoD has guns. Let's make AoS just building...oh but CoD also has 3d graphics...uhhh

Seriously, the fact that this game uses blocks means no matter what features you put in this game it will never be like CoD.

[XFrostByteX]

The game is Guns, Strategy(sometimes) and Building. How can you turn it into CoD without taking one of these features?

My point being, it be very hard to turn this into a CoD clone without completely changing core gameplay.

[Semper]

Why is everyone comparing this game to the crappy CoD?
Why not compare it to a million times better Medal of Honor?

I mean... Shutup, It's your opinion. Not everyone like's what you do, I agree with you about ''Why is everyone comparing this game to 'CoD' but you didn't have to say Crappy or ''Why not compare it to a million times better Medal of Honor, You don't like Cod, Some people don't like Medal of Honor, I myself never heard of that game.

[ChaosTLW]

Why is everyone comparing this game to the crappy CoD?
Why not compare it to a million times better Medal of Honor?

I mean... Shutup, It's your opinion. Not everyone like's what you do, I agree with you about ''Why is everyone comparing this game to 'CoD' but you didn't have to say Crappy or ''Why not compare it to a million times better Medal of Honor, You don't like Cod, Some people don't like Medal of Honor, I myself never heard of that game.

Dafuq dude, Medal of Honour was, like, CoD's arch-enemy, that guy you would throw in a volcano just to see him die. Well, that's was at least in the start, when both would try to kill each other by doing the best WWII game...

[KevinLancaster]

Lol, ironically Medal of Honor gave birth to Call of Duty since Infinity Ward was part of the original MoH team, leaving after Allied Assault since they were unhappy with EA.

[SRL]

I see another flame war is about to hit an oil refinery.


Well, many others have said it before. This game will never become a mainstream shooter, or Minecraft. Why, you ask? Well, for starters, and to quote Ben,

Your grandmother's rig can run this game.

Name an online shooter that can run on almost any computer, including my crappy IBM. Secondly, it involves building, which mainstream shooters do NOT. It has occasional strategic promotion, which is NOT in mainstream shooters. Lastly, a good amount of people are at least tolerable in the community. Which is NOT true about the mainstream shooter community.

There, I'm done. Go ahead, murder me for tolerating CoD and Battlefield and other shooters.

[ChaosTLW]

I see another flame war is about to hit an oil refinery.


Well, many others have said it before. This game will never become a mainstream shooter, or Minecraft. Why, you ask? Well, for starters, and to quote Ben,

Your grandmother's rig can run this game.

Name an online shooter that can run on almost any computer, including my crappy IBM. Secondly, it involves building, which mainstream shooters do NOT. It has occasional strategic promotion, which is NOT in mainstream shooters. Lastly, a good amount of people are at least tolerable in the community. Which is NOT true about the mainstream shooter community.

There, I'm done. Go ahead, murder me for tolerating CoD and Battlefield and other shooters.

Oh my god, a wild thought appears.
What if...
Ace of Spades sets up standart for future mainstream shooters?
/ConspiracyKeanu