Note: This forum is merely an archive. It is no longer possible to register or post. - StackOverflow
New Ace of Spades Forums: http://buildandshoot.com/

The 1.0 split up...

Off-topic stuff!

Paying or not

Poll ended at Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:09 am

Paying
19
25%
Not paying
31
41%
Maybe
25
33%
 
Total votes : 75

Re: The 1.0 split up...

Postby MarioCarter » Tue Aug 07, 2012 5:32 am

Of course not. It's ranging from 10$ to 15$ possibility. I would be fine without advantages- it's unfair, again. We get enhanced graphics and new features. I think that's enough. Plus updates.
I will never be afraid again
I will keep on fighting 'til the end
I can walk on water, I can fly
I will keep on fighting 'til I die
User avatar
MarioCarter
Member
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 7:12 am
Location: District 5, Panem

Re: The 1.0 split up...

Postby jdrewlowery » Tue Aug 07, 2012 5:36 am

MechaMortal445 wrote:I will pay for it, as long as it isn't a ridiculous amount of money like $20


it isnt probley wont be more then 10
I'm nooby and i know it
User avatar
jdrewlowery
[SPQR] Member
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:48 pm

Re: The 1.0 split up...

Postby Jdubya » Wed Aug 08, 2012 9:58 pm

A free to play game should never go pay to play. It'll simply die.

The devs could make this game pretty popular in our niche of people who can't give a shit about graphics. (if there's good gameplay) They need:

A. Polish the game. (Ie; gameplay and maybe some graphical. Who knows.)
B. Get exposure for their game. Spam message youtubers with it. Make your own youtube page and upload videos consistently.
C. Be professional. (Not to say one way or the other if they have.) Update the game consistently, on a set basis, until it's finished. No more of this random shenanigans.


THEN they can say they want money.

If this game's above $5, it better have turned excellent. At the rate this is going I don't see it being worth above 5 dollars.

What they should do instead of asking for us to buck a flat amount is, they should add perks to the people for making microtransactions.

Maybe you can donate to have a 64 slot (instead of <32) for a set amount of time and a small amout of money? Something of the sort.

Microtransactions are the future of online gaming.
User avatar
Jdubya
[SPQR] Member
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:59 pm

Re: The 1.0 split up...

Postby jdrewlowery » Wed Aug 08, 2012 10:24 pm

Jdubya wrote:A free to play game should never go pay to play. It'll simply die.

The devs could make this game pretty popular in our niche of people who can't give a shit about graphics. (if there's good gameplay) They need:

A. Polish the game. (Ie; gameplay and maybe some graphical. Who knows.)
B. Get exposure for their game. Spam message youtubers with it. Make your own youtube page and upload videos consistently.
C. Be professional. (Not to say one way or the other if they have.) Update the game consistently, on a set basis, until it's finished. No more of this random shenanigans.


THEN they can say they want money.

If this game's above $5, it better have turned excellent. At the rate this is going I don't see it being worth above 5 dollars.

What they should do instead of asking for us to buck a flat amount is, they should add perks to the people for making microtransactions.

Maybe you can donate to have a 64 slot (instead of <32) for a set amount of time and a small amout of money? Something of the sort.

Microtransactions are the future of online gaming.


wow just wow . its his game if he want to make people pay for it then they will pay . the games an indie game and its stil in beta . it isnt a real free to play game the dev only made 3 wepons so far so how else can they earn mony . ig you have some bright idea we would all love to hear it
I'm nooby and i know it
User avatar
jdrewlowery
[SPQR] Member
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:48 pm

Re: The 1.0 split up...

Postby corn99 » Wed Aug 08, 2012 10:28 pm

might pay but im not sure about the rest of my clan
corn99
[C.A.M.B] Leader
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 7:18 am
Location: Come here and i kill u

Re: The 1.0 split up...

Postby Rauder » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:16 pm

I've already played enough AoS to it be worth the $10 or whatever it might cost once/if it goes P2P. I'd gladly pay it, just out of support for the game. Hell, even if it stayed F2P I'd probably still throw in a donation.
User avatar
Rauder
Member
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:11 pm

Re: The 1.0 split up...

Postby Seal » Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:45 pm

I'm paying because I want to see all the new stuff and it doesnt cost so much money.
Image
User avatar
Seal
Member
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:09 pm
Location: Westminster, California, USA

Re: The 1.0 split up...

Postby Jdubya » Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:24 pm

jdrewlowery wrote:
Jdubya wrote:A free to play game should never go pay to play. It'll simply die.

The devs could make this game pretty popular in our niche of people who can't give a shit about graphics. (if there's good gameplay) They need:

A. Polish the game. (Ie; gameplay and maybe some graphical. Who knows.)
B. Get exposure for their game. Spam message youtubers with it. Make your own youtube page and upload videos consistently.
C. Be professional. (Not to say one way or the other if they have.) Update the game consistently, on a set basis, until it's finished. No more of this random shenanigans.


THEN they can say they want money.

If this game's above $5, it better have turned excellent. At the rate this is going I don't see it being worth above 5 dollars.

What they should do instead of asking for us to buck a flat amount is, they should add perks to the people for making microtransactions.

Maybe you can donate to have a 64 slot (instead of <32) for a set amount of time and a small amout of money? Something of the sort.

Microtransactions are the future of online gaming.


wow just wow . its his game if he want to make people pay for it then they will pay . the games an indie game and its stil in beta . it isnt a real free to play game the dev only made 3 wepons so far so how else can they earn mony . ig you have some bright idea we would all love to hear it


I just gave my bright idea? I'm saying from a market standpoint it's not a great idea to make people have to pay after them NOT having to pay.
User avatar
Jdubya
[SPQR] Member
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:59 pm

Re: The 1.0 split up...

Postby jdrewlowery » Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:23 am

Jdubya wrote:
jdrewlowery wrote:
Jdubya wrote:A free to play game should never go pay to play. It'll simply die.

The devs could make this game pretty popular in our niche of people who can't give a shit about graphics. (if there's good gameplay) They need:

A. Polish the game. (Ie; gameplay and maybe some graphical. Who knows.)
B. Get exposure for their game. Spam message youtubers with it. Make your own youtube page and upload videos consistently.
C. Be professional. (Not to say one way or the other if they have.) Update the game consistently, on a set basis, until it's finished. No more of this random shenanigans.


THEN they can say they want money.

If this game's above $5, it better have turned excellent. At the rate this is going I don't see it being worth above 5 dollars.

What they should do instead of asking for us to buck a flat amount is, they should add perks to the people for making microtransactions.

Maybe you can donate to have a 64 slot (instead of <32) for a set amount of time and a small amout of money? Something of the sort.

Microtransactions are the future of online gaming.


wow just wow . its his game if he want to make people pay for it then they will pay . the games an indie game and its stil in beta . it isnt a real free to play game the dev only made 3 wepons so far so how else can they earn mony . ig you have some bright idea we would all love to hear it


I just gave my bright idea? I'm saying from a market standpoint it's not a great idea to make people have to pay after them NOT having to pay.

you mad bro ?
I'm nooby and i know it
User avatar
jdrewlowery
[SPQR] Member
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:48 pm

Re: The 1.0 split up...

Postby Jdubya » Fri Aug 10, 2012 2:38 am

jdrewlowery wrote:
Jdubya wrote:
jdrewlowery wrote:
wow just wow . its his game if he want to make people pay for it then they will pay . the games an indie game and its stil in beta . it isnt a real free to play game the dev only made 3 wepons so far so how else can they earn mony . ig you have some bright idea we would all love to hear it


I just gave my bright idea? I'm saying from a market standpoint it's not a great idea to make people have to pay after them NOT having to pay.

you mad bro ?

You're the one who got all defensive over my statement...I'm just trying to give my 2 cents, while you refuse to stop acting like a haughty 10 year old.
User avatar
Jdubya
[SPQR] Member
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:59 pm

Re: The 1.0 split up...

Postby Thelionmaster » Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:51 am

Yeah..I'm going to pay. I wanna see the cool stuff. But I will play the free version too, because most of my clan is going with that.
Image
Most lions are expected to hunt prey and roar loud,
But this one is different.
This one is a first person shooter,
A great spadekiller,
And a Sticky Bandit.
My IGN: [TSB] Lion
Thelionmaster
[TSB] Member
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 2:48 am
Location: California

Re: The 1.0 split up...

Postby Becool362 » Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:00 pm

Idk what to choose as the development of this game is going really slow and also if it does come to P2P i won't be able to play but oh well do what minecraft did and have a classic part.
Image
Image

Rainbow Dash is the Best Pony, No wait I am.
User avatar
Becool362
Member
 
Posts: 595
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 8:46 am
Location: I'm Watching You {.}{.}

Re: The 1.0 split up...

Postby Dracolth » Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:09 am

Yeah, but the classic version is absolutely boring compared to the P2P version.
I probably won't pay, the whole appeal of Ace of Spades is the F2P and simpleness. I just hope they don't wreck it with TOO many updates like Minecraft (1.7.3 or 1.8 were the best) Maybe just more variations in modding compatability?

Image
^
|
|
I support this
Image
User avatar
Dracolth
Member
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Windowless White Van

Re: The 1.0 split up...

Postby Kodiak » Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:39 am

Welcome to Capitalism. Ben (and mat^2) work hard on something they presumably love, and love creating, but at the end of the day they need to make a buck. In the past year playing Ace of Spades I've made numerous friends inside the Komrades, and out (hello Reuben), and these are friendships I treasure. The fun I've had already in the free version, and the countless hours I spent, free of charge, honing my skills to become halfway decent at this game already makes me feel as though I owe it to Ben (and mat^2) for giving me the best game I've ever played. Provided my father allows it, I'll certainly be buying Ace of Spades.
Image
^Click the eyes for the IRC^
Image - Image - Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Kodiak
[SPQR] Member
 
Posts: 875
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:28 am
Location: Location Removalist (Head Office)

Re: The 1.0 split up...

Postby XFrostByteX » Sun Aug 12, 2012 1:41 pm

1 Dollar: I'll pay, because I can get that much moeny into a paypal account for free
5 Dollars: OAH MAH GAWD WHAT DO YOU THINK I AM A RICH PERSON????

I don't like where this game is going. The payed users get pampered, and the free uses get treated like crap with updates and ads. If it's like 1 dollar, I guess i'd pay for it (if it didn't lag my system like normal AoS).
User avatar
XFrostByteX
Member
 
Posts: 317
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 8:55 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PreviousNext

Return to The Lounge



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest