SueSakamoto wrote:If BF3 was realistic I wouldn't have fun dicking around on the game. Seriously all I do.
New close quarters DLC makes it into CoD anyways. Kinda gay.
ChaosTLW wrote:And I hope this new DLC, Armored Kill, helps redeem it. I fear it will be shit to play on a 2Km wide map with only 24 players on console. Seriously, if they could up it to 48 players, or even 32 it would be much better.
xBURGERx wrote:I don't think bf3 is realistic at all
razor10000 wrote:ChaosTLW wrote:And I hope this new DLC, Armored Kill, helps redeem it. I fear it will be shit to play on a 2Km wide map with only 24 players on console. Seriously, if they could up it to 48 players, or even 32 it would be much better.
I think 24 is the console limit. Don't know why. Most other shooters only go up to as far as 16 anyways.
CraftDinur wrote:i personally think the arma II mod DayZ (must pl0y this *_*) is more realistic than battlefield 3. it starts you off with basically nothing and causes all your actions to effect gameplay such as sound, sight, and mowing down grass. as well as that, you also have to keep an eye out for hunger, thirst, breaking bones, bleeding out, and pain which is way more realistic than getting shot and hiding out somewhere until you can mow down more people again.
ChaosTLW wrote:razor10000 wrote:ChaosTLW wrote:And I hope this new DLC, Armored Kill, helps redeem it. I fear it will be shit to play on a 2Km wide map with only 24 players on console. Seriously, if they could up it to 48 players, or even 32 it would be much better.
I think 24 is the console limit. Don't know why. Most other shooters only go up to as far as 16 anyways.
If I'm not mistaken, DICE already said they could go up to 32 players on console, but they thought 24 was the "sweet spot" or some shit like that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest