The legality of MAC spoofing (Split from "Too many aimbots.")

by **Tocksman** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:05 am

mikuli wrote:macchanger --mac=13:37:DE:AD:BE:EF eth1

OMG YOU WILL BE ARRESTED

by **Deucebag** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:12 am

1) Wikipedia is not adequate citation material. I give you this, instead: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1343.html
2) Mac spoofing, in and of itself, does not "deprive of a right, money, or property by fraud" (see: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/defraud
Therefor it is not wire fraud.

by **USABxBOOYO** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:17 am

Tocksman wrote:
mikuli wrote:macchanger --mac=13:37:DE:AD:BE:EF eth1

OMG YOU WILL BE ARRESTED

by **Defaulter** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:19 am

USABxBOOYO wrote:
Tocksman wrote:
mikuli wrote:macchanger --mac=13:37:DE:AD:BE:EF eth1

OMG YOU WILL BE ARRESTED

*Reaches into pocket for ID to show the agent*

O FFFFUUUUUUUUU

by **Deucebag** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:24 am

by **Deucebag** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:35 am

by **Pulchritude** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:57 pm

Proxies must be illegal too then

/sarcasm.

by **IrishElf** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:18 pm

This thread is just too funny, I'm dying over here!

by **DeDucer** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:18 pm

Lol @ the pics

At least Build stopped posting after he made himself look very stupid several times.
Only the intentional manipulation of information/devices without authorization of the owning party (aka. hacking) is illegal.
Spoofing your MAC in order to access someones network or restricted services falls under that, other than that NOBODY cares, it's not even useful after your packets were transported outside your ISPs network.
I can only assume Build mixed up IP and MAC - adresses just any other computer illiterate out there who is using google and writing half-hearted wikipedia articles.

LURK MORE AND LOOK UP THE OSI MODEL!

Additionally, violating the ToS is NOT A CRIME!!! Of course you lose your right to use the service or can be held liable for any damage you may have caused, but only few people will raise an eyebrow. Btw, I didn't even get across any passage which clearifies the licence AOS is published under.

Computer analphabetism is being fucking retarded!

by **Tocksman** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:54 am

DeDucer wrote:Spoofing your MAC in order to access someones network or restricted services falls under that, other than that NOBODY cares, it's not even useful after your packets were transported outside your ISPs network.
I can only assume Build mixed up IP and MAC - adresses just any other computer illiterate out there who is using google and writing half-hearted wikipedia articles.

Finally! Was wondering how long it would take for someone to come and say this.

The legality of MAC spoofing (Split from "Too many aimbots.")

Re: The legality of MAC spoofing (Split from "Too many aimbo

Re: The legality of MAC spoofing (Split from "Too many aimbo

Re: The legality of MAC spoofing (Split from "Too many aimbo

Re: The legality of MAC spoofing (Split from "Too many aimbo

Re: The legality of MAC spoofing (Split from "Too many aimbo

Re: The legality of MAC spoofing (Split from "Too many aimbo

Re: The legality of MAC spoofing (Split from "Too many aimbo

Re: The legality of MAC spoofing (Split from "Too many aimbo

Re: The legality of MAC spoofing (Split from "Too many aimbo

Re: The legality of MAC spoofing (Split from "Too many aimbo

Who is online