Who plans on buying Ace of Spades 1.0?

[xEric]

I've heard numerous people saying In 1.0 Aos Is going to cost.

What I like about this
- Less hacks ( due to the registration system less hackers will be out there. ( Only if you want to waste your money )

What I dislike
- Clans will fall. Most people play this game because It's free, 50% Minecraft 50% FPS and... It's free.

[MrHaaaaaaxFF]

Welllllllll did anyone in this forums has an idea to stop this being pay 2 play(but still can support Ben)
I'm not sure, the only way for this is DONATING.

[xEric]

I don't think no one would donate to this once a year update game
:/

[EldredChandler]

I don't think no one would donate to this once a year update game
:/

I think it's a bit of an overstatement to say no one would, I'm sure out of all the people who play, some would be willing to donate.

[MrHaaaaaaxFF]

I could count about more than 10 people willing to donate to this game, judging from people willing to pay it if it's going to Pay 2 Play.

[SuckMyVox]

I've heard numerous people saying In 1.0 Aos Is going to cost.

What I like about this
- Less hacks ( due to the registration system less hackers will be out there. ( Only if you want to waste your money )

What I dislike
- Clans will fall. Most people play this game because It's free, 50% Minecraft 50% FPS and... It's free.

AoS possibly costing 10 bucks or something would NOT MAKE IT P2P. It would make it B2P (Buy2Play).

Pay2Play means AoS would become a subscription service and require a monthly fee to play.

I for one would have no problem paying a "box" price for AoS.

While doing so would cut down on the number of players, I don't think it would cut down on the percentage of haxxors and cheaters. Cheaters still gonna cheat.

AoS updating their anti-hack measures then issuing mass global bans would be something that would cut down on hackers.

[Blithehehe]

I don't think no one would donate to this once a year update game
:/

I think so

[kmaj]

I don't think no one would donate to this once a year update game
:/

Nor do I. There are people who will gladly do.

[lehma18]

Yes, it is true. It'll cost around 10 bucks.
For an alternative money-making way Ben could fill the site with adds. Since i have an ace(heh) up my sleeve, ads wouldn't be a problem for me.

[Leonzable]

If I were to pay
I'm sure not many other people would
So there could be the unfortunate situation where there's like 10 players online

[Varun]

Underexaggeration, but yeah, there would be fewer players. And clans would fall. Social ones, and ones that don't focus to greatly on gaming, but still are competitive would have an easy time, but I can see a lot of people not playing.

[MrHaaaaaaxFF]

Fill up with ads?
Take a link to AdBlock in Links section, lol.

[SIMOX]

Ben just have to make two versions of the game. Free basic version and Full with more weapons, gamemodes, features, etc. (Like King Arthur's Gold)

[xEric]

I've heard numerous people saying In 1.0 Aos Is going to cost.

What I like about this
- Less hacks ( due to the registration system less hackers will be out there. ( Only if you want to waste your money )

What I dislike
- Clans will fall. Most people play this game because It's free, 50% Minecraft 50% FPS and... It's free.

AoS possibly costing 10 bucks or something would NOT MAKE IT P2P. It would make it B2P (Buy2Play).

Pay2Play means AoS would become a subscription service and require a monthly fee to play.

I for one would have no problem paying a "box" price for AoS.

While doing so would cut down on the number of players, I don't think it would cut down on the percentage of haxxors and cheaters. Cheaters still gonna cheat.

AoS updating their anti-hack measures then issuing mass global bans would be something that would cut down on hackers.

Oh, Never played a game that I payed for on the computer except minecraft.

[ChaosTLW]

Depending on the price, I would gladily pay for AoS. And I know there would be many people who would do the same.