Hydemango wrote:Barely any of them are good. Have you heard of fan-art? That's what they all are.
Also, you have no idea what "stock" is, I was basically calling him retarded.
Learn what purple prose is.
Your phrase "low-stock" can ber horribly miss interperited as in terms of digital art, images made by one person that are used in creation of other images by another person is known as stock images, or stock for short. when you said low stock, i thought you meant that you used low stock image amounts.
on the other hand, you said that fan art is not good, but just because its fan art. So i would like it if you could explain to me exactly why her art, for example, is bad. and dont jsut say "because its fan art". all that tells me is that the very basic concept was not her idea. tell me more. tell me a good reason to believe that all fan art is bad because it is fan art. if you could, i would love it if you could point out to me the exact area where she went wrong and could have made it art instead of non-art
and in case you have never seen her videos, you can see exactly how they were made here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2lvxFOQ ... sults_mainbtw, were your images actually low stock, now thaty you know what the term truely means?